Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Advertisements and their Advertiser


When talking about consumer privacy and the fact that internet tracking is so sophisticated now that there are actual algorithms used to track purchases is a scary involvement to some consumers. The fact that a store can track your purchases, use these purchases to catalog you, and use this information to send you benefits to help you save money on their products is also somewhat ingenious. Technology, as I said before, is an evolving creature that has no boundaries. It does not take in account privacy or laws. It does not abide by any rules. It’s just there. As consumers we need to set lines and borders on what’s right and what is wrong. You wouldn’t let a rabid dog go running around the neighborhood without a leach on would you? Technology is kind of like that. It doesn’t mean to hurt people or harm them; it doesn’t know better. But if you teach it and set some ground rules you’ll get a better behaved dog- same goes with technology and its uses.
On the matter of technology, let’s dive into advertisements. We are presented with them every day, bombard after bombard of “buy my product and make my company happy” commercials and ad’s. But advertisers are becoming smarter and efficient with their tactics. Advertisers target the products that will appeal to a certain age group or gender by using their loss of privacy as a key method. Now this could have a negative and positive outcome. Let’s start with the positive. Our loss of privacy when dealing with companies and stores can be put to use by showing us ads that will appeal individually to the consumer. This could be less time consuming and helpful towards this targeted audience. Companies waste less money and we get to see ads that could be potentially used. But the negative outcome is what concerns me as the consumer.
 I’m too young to buy beer. So when I see a hot chick in a bar serving a guy a “refreshing” beer it makes me uncomfortable. Even though I can’t buy the product yet, (not saying that I want to but the example sake) I still don’t see why a hot guy couldn’t be handing a girl a beer. When you walk into a bar you see both groups of guys and girls. You may not always see the hot bartender but that shouldn’t be an expectation when you go out.
Leaning on this example, stereotypes enforced by advertisers is another negative outcome. We shouldn’t trust this. I mean come on! Guys aren’t the only people on the planet to drink beer! Ever hear girls can do the same thing guys can and vice versa? Pushing this stereotype and gender class is useless. Advertisers need to stop pushing these ideas into viewer.  It’s as if we still have advertisers from the 1950’s creating commercials for this day and age. Times have change advertisers, get on board.

3 comments:

  1. The analogy used in regards to technology as an evolving creature is spot on. Technology is constantly evolving and growing and it has no bounds; herein lays one of the biggest problems. If legislation is passed to address this issue, it would only be enforceable in the country in which these laws are passed. What happens when companies from outside the United States are doing the tracking? They do not have to abide by laws that are set in this country. Then the question becomes should we limit access to these sites from the U.S. to protect the citizens? And when we ask questions like that we are opening a big can of worms! We cannot restrict people’s rights to access any kind of information, even (or maybe especially) shopping. I think our best bet is to educate the consumer, put a “leash” on them and hope they do not get into trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it is very cleaver how you connected technology to a rabid dog and was a very good use of simile. The cookies are not there to intentionally make that person who they are following’s life worse, but instead help. The connection of the positive affect of cookies was very well put; people do not want to watch advertisements that do not interest them, therefore it is both saving time for the consumer and saving money for the advertiser. Next, I definitely agree with how you have tied advertising company’s stereotypes to being a negative affect on the opposite audience for some products. By advertisements creating these stereotypes, the way men and women are viewed creates this feeling that how the advertisers see them is how they are meant to be seen. This brings a sexist view to advertisements.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice introduction.! I like the simile you use with the dog. One thing that I think about that comparison is the fact that when we do see a dog like that, its not always any type of person who puts a leash on it. We usually would call the dog pound or the owner so who would we call in this case? Which pound would we direct to for this imprudent rabid ads or technology? Also I think you are so right when you mention the stereotypes used. There is always a type of sexist image or comment being transmitted and unfortunately we see it so much that even us womem expect to see these things, like the hot girl as a bartender etc. Great job analyzing this I really enjoyed reading this.

    ReplyDelete